 |
|
Dr Alan Rabinowitz talks about the status
of tigers in Myanmar. Pic: Aye Zaw Myo |
THE key to saving Myanmar’s dwindling population of tigers
from extinction is providing alternative incomes for the people
who live in areas where the big cats roam, said Dr Alan Rabinowitz,
the executive director of science and exploration at the US-based
Wildlife Conservation Society.
“Tigers are not doing well in Myanmar. Because of hunting
tigers and hunting the food that tigers eat such as samba, deer
and wild pigs, tigers are still in danger of extinction,”
Dr Rabinowitz told The Myanmar Times in an interview in Yangon
last week.
“If we don’t do a much better job saving tigers,
tigers will be gone in Myanmar because there aren’t many
left,” he said.
Dr Rabinowitz was in Myanmar from February 28 to March 9, during
which he attended a workshop in Nay Pyi Taw on the development
of a curriculum for a new postgraduate diploma course in wildlife
management at the Forestry University in Yezin.
Dr Rabinowitz has been doing tiger conservation work in Myanmar
since 1996 and was instrumental in helping establish the Hukaung
Valley Tiger Reserve in Kachin State in northern Myanmar in 2002.
At 21,890 square kilometres (8452 square miles) it is now the
biggest tiger reserve in the world.
“I think no more than 200 tigers are left in the whole
country. But Hukaung Valley is the best chance for them,”
he said. “About 100 tigers are living there and another
100 are living in Tanintharyi Division.”
“My team tells me that the Tanintharyi forests are drier
with more bamboo. They’re extensive and uncut, and the mountains
along the border are not so high so tigers can roam both countries,”
Dr Rabinowitz said.
In fact, one of the more ambitious plans by WCS and another
US-based NGO, Panthera Foundation, is the establishment of a 5000-mile-long
“genetic corridor” for tigers stretching from Bhutan
to Malaysia, passing through northeast India, Myanmar and Thailand.
The idea, aimed at the long-term preservation of tigers in Asia,
has already been presented to the United Nations and been endorsed
by the new king of Bhutan, his Majesty Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck,
who requested other heads of state to support similar efforts.
“The idea of the genetic corridor is to let tigers roam
freely and crossbreed,” Dr Rabinowitz said.
He explained that the corridors did not have to be pristine
parkland but could include agricultural areas, ranches, and other
multi-use landscapes – just as long as tigers could use
them to travel between wilderness areas.
“We’re not asking countries to set aside new parks
to make this corridor a success,” he was quoted as saying
last month in a report in ScienceDaily. “This is more about
changing regional zoning in tiger range states to allow tigers
to move more freely between areas of good habitat.”
He said the main challenge was finding a way to connect Hukaung
Valley and Tanintharyi Division, mostly through Shan State.
“We know there are no tigers between there. We don’t
need tigers to be there. We just need pigs and deer in the woodlands
so tigers can have some area in the middle where they can feed
while they travel,” he said.
He added that the corridor would be a success if even one tiger
made the trip from one habitat area to another every 10 or 20
years.
In the meantime, Dr Rabinowitz said the Myanmar government has
been “very good” in terms of establishing Hukaung
Valley as a protected area for tigers.
Still, threats to the region’s tiger population remain,
especially from local hunters who know they can make money from
killing the animals and selling their parts to the Chinese medicine
trade.
“It is very hard to stop the killing of tigers when local
villagers know that if they kill even a single tiger they can
buy a new house or do something that changes their life,”
Dr Rabinowitz said.
“But Myanmar is not benefiting from the deaths of those
animals. The hunter gets the least amount of money. He’ll
get anywhere from US$200 to $500 while the trader can get about
$100,000 when its parts, skin, bones, eyeballs and penis are sold
in China,” he said.
Dr Rabinowitz said that to stop people from killing tigers,
they must be made to understand the value of the animals when
they are alive – that is, how to get money from live animals
rather than dead ones.
“Tourism is very good for local people. It provides alternative
job opportunities that can stop local people from hunting,”
he said.
“Ecotourism is big money. Tourists hire guides, boats,
cars. If tourists come and spend money to see wildlife, then the
local people start feeling that wildlife is more valuable alive
than dead.”
He said Hukaung Valley is a great place for ecotourism because
it can be reached via airplane from Yangon to Myitkyina, followed
by a three-hour drive by car to Tanai in the heart of the valley.
“The road is okay in the dry season but not in rainy season.
There is a guesthouse in Tanai where tourists can stay and now
two hotels are being built there,” he said.
“People can still experience the cultures of the Naga
people, the Kachin, the Shan and the Lisu. They can go bird watching,
ride elephants and see wildlife. That is what we need to develop
in Hukaung Valley,” he said.
Dr Rabinowitz said tourism also gives people pride in their
culture and a reason to preserve their traditions as tourists
come to their villages.
“Tourism also allows people who live in remote regions
to feel like they’re part of a bigger country rather than
feeling like they’re in the middle of nowhere and nobody
cares about them,” he said.
“Myanmar is very special. It has many places that would
be very good for ecotourism, like Hkakabo Razi [in Kachin State],”
he added.
Dr Rabinowitz said infrastructure was not an issue because most
ecotourists prefer living in the local style while travelling
rather than staying in fancy hotels.
“It doesn’t cost much to build this kind of accommodation
and it will attract tourists who will spend a lot of money and
raise the socioeconomic situation of the local people. At the
same time, wildlife can be saved and the country can become united,”
he said.